The table below shows the number of temporary migrant worker in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1,000 people in these countries in 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. You should write at least 150 words.
The table above
depict
the number of migrant workers temporarily in four different countries between Change the verb form
depicts
years
2003 and 2006. Correct article usage
the years
Overall
, it can be seen that the USA was consistently as
a country that has Change preposition
apply
most
migrant workers among other countries. Meanwhile, New Correct article usage
the most
Zealend
was the Correct your spelling
Zealand
least
country that Correct your spelling
last
has
migrant workers.
In 2003, Australia Wrong verb form
had
has
as many as 152.000 migrant staff. Wrong verb form
had
Then
, sharply jumped to 219.000. Furthermore
, the average was 10.7 migrant staff per 1000 people in 2006. Besides
that, the total number of migrant staff in New Zealand was around 65.000. After that, slightly increased to 87.000. The average was about 21.1.
Moreover
, the United Kingdom started with 137.000 migrant employee
. Afterwards, dramatically soared to 266.000. Per 1000 people in 2006, there was 4.4 migrant Change to a plural noun
employees
employee
. Later, in 2003, the United States Fix the agreement mistake
employees
has
577.000 migrant Wrong verb form
had
employee
Change to a plural noun
employees
while
the number constantly surged to 678.000. Not only that,
but Remove the comma
apply
also
the average was 2.3Submitted by wishmeluck on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Vocabulary: Rephrase the word "number of" in your introduction.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "number of" was used 2 times.
▼