The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

The table gives information about

Use synonyms

percentage

Add an article

the percentage

show examples

of different household groups living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

It is clear that

Linking Words

sole parents and single families without children have the highest

percentage

Use synonyms

in terms of living in poverty,

while

Linking Words

aged

couples

Use synonyms

seem to be the smallest in proportion of all households.

To begin

Linking Words

, in 1999, all of

categories

Add an article

the categories

show examples

to gather formed apply all household types, which was around a population of 2 million and accounted for 11% of poverty in the day. It is obvious that

sole

Correct your spelling

some

show examples

parents have the significantly biggest

percentage

Use synonyms

in those terms is 21%.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, single adults have a slightly higher proportion of 19%,

while

Linking Words

there is only a 2% gap between

this

Linking Words

figure for sole parents.

In contrast

Linking Words

,

couples

Use synonyms

with children come in second place after these

apply

Wrong verb form

applied

show examples

factors by 12%.

Moreover

Linking Words

, other categories are less poor compared to the ones mentioned. In detail, aged

couples

Use synonyms

have the lowest figure on family type with only 4%. The

couples

Use synonyms

that have no children and single aged people, both have the lower

percentage

Use synonyms

which is below 10%, with 7% and 6% respectively.