The table gives information about
Use synonyms
percentage
of different household groups living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
Add an article
the percentage
It is clear that
sole parents and single families without children have the highest Linking Words
percentage
in terms of living in poverty, Use synonyms
while
aged Linking Words
couples
seem to be the smallest in proportion of all households.
Use synonyms
To begin
, in 1999, all of Linking Words
categories
to gather formed apply all household types, which was around a population of 2 million and accounted for 11% of poverty in the day. It is obvious that Add an article
the categories
sole
parents have the significantly biggest Correct your spelling
some
percentage
in those terms is 21%. Use synonyms
Furthermore
, single adults have a slightly higher proportion of 19%, Linking Words
while
there is only a 2% gap between Linking Words
this
figure for sole parents.Linking Words
In contrast
, Linking Words
couples
with children come in second place after these Use synonyms
apply
factors by 12%.
Wrong verb form
applied
Moreover
, other categories are less poor compared to the ones mentioned. In detail, aged Linking Words
couples
have the lowest figure on family type with only 4%. The Use synonyms
couples
that have no children and single aged people, both have the lower Use synonyms
percentage
which is below 10%, with 7% and 6% respectively.Use synonyms
chunyanh502