Some people believe that governments should provide free public transportation to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. Others argue that individuals should pay for the services they use. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✍️ Want to check your own essay?Write on this topic →
Ans: It is an irrefutable fact that traffic congestion and pollution have become
a
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
pressing issues in recent years.
While
Linking Words
some
people
Use synonyms
argue that providing free public transportation is a prudent strategy to deal with these problems, others reject
this
Linking Words
notion and believe that these initiatives will increase the financial burden on the government. I totally agree with the former statement.
This
Linking Words
essay will analyse my views using relevant examples to support my arguments. Many
people
Use synonyms
are of the view that
this
Linking Words
programme will force the government to allocate more funds for the maintenance of state-funded transport
vehicles
Use synonyms
. When a large number of
people
Use synonyms
travel without paying a service fee, the government’s revenue will decrease.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, when more
people
Use synonyms
will
Wrong verb form
apply
show examples
use free
services
Use synonyms
, the maintenance cost for facilitating transport
services
Use synonyms
will be higher than usual.
Moreover
Linking Words
, in order to add more buses, metros, and trains for serving the public, funding allocated to road development may be reduced. The poor condition of the
roads
Use synonyms
may result in delays in other
services
Use synonyms
for the general public,
such
Linking Words
as ambulance
services
Use synonyms
, freight movement, and fire evacuation
services
Use synonyms
.
However
Linking Words
, in my opinion, the environmental damage
due to
Linking Words
road congestion is a major concern
,
Punctuation problem
apply
show examples
which needs to be addressed as a priority nowadays. I take the side of the
people
Use synonyms
who support the perspective that free access to public transportation will help mitigate environmental damage by reducing the number of
vehicles
Use synonyms
on the
roads
Use synonyms
. Many
people
Use synonyms
prefer driving their own
vehicles
Use synonyms
because it is more convenient
and
Punctuation problem
, and
show examples
they
are paying
Wrong verb form
pay
show examples
slightly more for owning and maintaining
vehicles
Use synonyms
.
This
Linking Words
leads to increased air pollution through the emission of gases by the use of more and more private cars and bikes.
However
Linking Words
, if an individual can use public buses without any service charges, it will encourage them to abandon their private vehicle for daily commuting.
Hence
Linking Words
, it will significantly contribute to environmental protection by minimising the number of
vehicles
Use synonyms
on the
roads
Use synonyms
.
For example
Linking Words
, many cities in India have observed a tremendous improvement in
its
Fix the agreement mistake
their
show examples
air quality index when they stopped accepting any bus fare from the commuters because
flow
Correct article usage
the flow
show examples
of private cars
got
Verb problem
apply
show examples
declined in the city. In conclusion,
although
Linking Words
people
Use synonyms
strongly argue that providing free commuting service is not a prudent step
due to
Linking Words
its adverse impacts on other public
services
Use synonyms
, I firmly believe protecting our
eco system
Correct your spelling
ecosystem
is holds a more significance.
Thus
Linking Words
, offering free transportation is a great initiative that the government should take to alleviate traffic congestion on the
roads
Use synonyms
.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task response
Score: 6. Your answer deals with the question well, but it is not fully strong. You say free travel should be given, yet you do not explain how the government can pay for it. Add one or two ideas, such as money from tax, parking fees, or a charge for cars in busy city areas.
Task response
Your India example is useful, but it is too broad. Say one city, what changed, and why this shows your point. Also, do not make a very strong claim unless you can show it clearly.
Task response
The first body part gives many bad results of free travel. This is good for balance, but your reply to these bad results is short. After them, explain why the good side is still greater.
Coherence and cohesion
Score: 6. The order is easy to follow, but some parts have too many ideas at once. For example, the first body part moves from cost, to roads, to ambulances, to fire help. Keep one main idea in each part.
Coherence and cohesion
Make the main sentence of each body part more direct. Body 1 could be about cost to the state. Body 2 could be about less car use and cleaner air.
Coherence and cohesion
Some links are not fully clear. “On the other hand” is not the best link after the point about less state money, because both ideas are about cost. Use “In addition” there instead.
Coherence and cohesion
Your last paragraph repeats your view, which is good. Make it shorter and more exact: free public transport can cut car use, traffic, and air harm, but the state must plan how to pay for it.
Task response
You give a clear view: you agree that free public transport can help cut traffic and air harm.
Task response
You discuss both sides, then give reasons for your own side.
Coherence and cohesion
Your essay has a clear start, two main body parts, and an end.
Coherence and cohesion
Words such as “On the other hand”, “However”, “Moreover”, and “For example” help the reader follow your ideas.
Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: