Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development?

In the fierce competition for employment these days, recruiters now have a liking to consider job seekers with
academic qualification
Suggestion
an academic qualification
academic qualifications
than those who have rich life experience and virtues as their main advantages. In my opinion,
this
idea mostly
Accept comma addition
idea, mostly
stems from
employers’ common stereotype
Suggestion
employers’ common stereotypes
the employers’ common stereotype
about the value of qualifications and
this
could have
unfavorable
not encouraging or approving or pleasing
unfavourable
implications
to
Suggestion
for
of
a
company
. There are three main reasons that comprise the stereotype behind the tendency.
First
of all, employers usually hold a belief that applicants with good academic background and qualified degrees would have in-depth knowledge as well as useful skills in their field.
This
idea can be observed in many countries
such
as
Japan where
Accept comma addition
Japan, where
only people coming from prestigious universities can make their way to top enterprises.
Secondly
, candidates with
good
Suggestion
the best
better
qualifications are usually thought to be ambitious people who are capable of bringing radical changes to the
company
and help the business flourish. What is more, the recruiters are always apt to the hunt of human capital with formal academic background simply because it can help save a fortune of retraining if they choose people with lower qualifications. As far as I am concerned,
this
trend could lead to serious setbacks to the development of any
company
. For one thing, those underestimated life experiences could in fact provide people with new insights or new perspectives that assist them in tackling problems which can’t be solved in conventional approaches. Another important point is that hiring people with good personal qualities offers mangers golden opportunity to create a friendly working environment with highly responsible team players.
In addition
, these types of candidates could help to establish a healthy business ethics of a
company
for which they are less likely to cause fraudulent acts or disruptive
behaviors
manner of acting or controlling yourself
behaviour
behaviours
. In sum, the idea to hire people with formal qualifications and yet depreciate the value of rich life experiences and personal virtues mainly comes from recruiters’ unfair beliefs and should be seriously reconsidered. People with possession of both would be the most suitable to be hired.
Submitted by Long on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • standardized measure
  • specialized expertise
  • dedication
  • long-term goal
  • higher education
  • practical skills
  • adaptability
  • problem-solving abilities
  • communication skills
  • teamwork
  • leadership
  • homogeneous
  • diverse perspectives
  • negative development
  • inequality
  • valuable skills
  • insights
  • balanced approach
  • proficiency
  • safety standards
  • candidate's profile
What to do next:
Look at other essays: