Some employers offer their employees subsidized membership pf gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so. Consider the arguments from both aspects of this possible debate, and reach a conclusion.

Productivity, the most significant factor of development in an organization, and measures to raise amid human resources through health-related subsidies,

although

profoundly pertaining to internal huge organizational policies, is rather considered a controversial issue among entrepreneurs. There are arguments on both sides,

however

, as we shall see. On the one hand, those who believe fitness and well-being programs have direct influence on efficiency point to

the lower

Suggestion

the lowest

level of stress that workforces undergo due to being in fit situation,

consequently

a thriving element in companies.

Furthermore

, it might be said that

such

activities regulate work/life balance, a situation in which job satisfaction is sweepingly achieved and will put organizations in progress.

Finally

, they emphasize that supportive physical measures are more achievable than financial motivating policies

such

as paying increments, perks and pecuniary rewards like incentives and bonuses, a

discriminational

unfair treatment of a person or group on the basis of prejudice

discrimination

rule imposed on staff in the face of which output is overwhelmingly plummeted. By marked contrast,

opposers

be against; express opposition to

opposes

argue bodily motivations are not measurable enough to gauge final employees’ performance, contrary to fiscal rewards. It might

also

be said that subsidies are extremely costly alongside less improvement,

instead

of which managers should pay

on

Suggestion

for

ongoing training to enhance

labor

a social class comprising those who do manual labor or work for wages

labour

force abilities by which job prospects shall soar. As a

last

point, they state that when reviewing staff’s yield, only financial stimulus may be

measurable

Suggestion

measured

to assess

progression

Suggestion

progress

in companies, a criterion that may

also

save employees when redundancy is unavoidably needed while downsizing, restructuring or outsourcing. Overall, it appears to me that the strongest argument is in

favor

promote over another

favour

of predicting measurable steps, with all advantages

such

as performance

measurability

, job progression and cementing position, provided that employers supply physical and mental requirements for them.