Most high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 per cent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women. Do you agree?

In numerous countries, more than half of the companies' workforce is comprised of women but the majority of executive positions are taken by men. Many believe that a percentage for top-level ranks should be filled by women. In my opinion,
however
, gender should not be the basis for one's promotion, which may slow a business' growth, but should be from objective qualifications ,
hence
my disagreement. I will discuss the reasons in detail in the following essay. The basis for earning a high-rank position should be objectively justified. Qualifications should be specifically enumerated and
then
be attained before one can earn the highly sought placement. One's strengths and weaknesses are not gender-specific so an individual's knowledge, skills and attitude should be the things to be considered.
This
will give everyone a fair chance and in turn, they will be more motivated to show their capabilities in the full potential that can greatly contribute to the production and revenue of the company.
For instance
, Google has a ladder-to-rank approach in promotions that every employee has to fulfil before moving up to the top. To make a mandatory position for women for the sake of fulfilling a percentage may hinder a company's full potential. A more deserving and abled individual may be disregarded in favour of a less skilled female counterpart and vice versa.
This
will dishearten employees and may make them indolent.
Furthermore
, competitiveness among the same gender will be more prominent because the company-wide selection is not implemented.
This
may cause more tension and will hugely affect their performance. In conclusion, clear attributes should be the basis if a person should take a chief rank and not because of one's sex. The ramification for
this
type of selection process will affect in great level the productivity and progress of a company.
Submitted by mizzy_ash on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Gender diversity
  • Affirmative action
  • Meritocracy
  • Quotas
  • Glass ceiling
  • Legal enforcement
  • Tokenism
  • Voluntary measures
  • Career progression
  • Representation
  • Workforce parity
  • Backlash
  • Historical imbalances
  • Corporate governance
  • Inclusive practices
  • Boardroom dynamics
  • Gender norms
  • Unconscious bias
  • Regulatory frameworks
  • Corporate ladder
What to do next:
Look at other essays: