In countries with a high rate of unemployment, numerous pupils should do offered only predominant education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.

Job scarcity with the increasing unemployment percentage is a significant concern in numerous nations. The ministry does not encourage the community to take secondary academic and thought it is not constructive for the community with populations with no hope of finding a job. I am afraid I entirely have to disagree with

this

short-sight. In general, the government should do all its part to ensure that as many societies finish high school and university as possible.

First

, future knowledge is essential for everybody who is in the state.

This

awareness background could help the community engage with high employment standards and create various job opportunities. Most entrepreneurs and business people who create employment themselves receive schooling. There is the population who make growth and opportunity in society.

Conversely

, those without discipline can only struggle to look after themselves.

Second

, the government can not save

this

range of money if the regime does not invest in secondary learning when the outlook is wrong. Indeed

this

is not a correct decision. It engages with a long-term situation of an undereducated and underdeveloped society. In the

Add a comma

,summerize

show examples

summerize

Correct your spelling

summarize

show examples

the authority should prioritize all types of observation to help increase the knowledge rate, must not take shortcuts, and reduce the unemployment percentage