Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies. However, Interviews form the basic criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The meeting is the principal for selecting the mass big firm. I agree with

this

statement. The

interview

is a reliable practice.

To begin

with, many reasons why an

interview

is an important way to apply to recruiters.

First

and foremost, an

interview

is the only method in which employers can get an idea about a candidate's personality and social skills and

also

know about her nature in hearing candidates get face to face communication. ,

Also

employees can judge their ability how to handle any situation, hard work and pressure and

also

ask study questions, but

also

know about their knowledge. On the other, hand there are many other selection methods with varied advantages. one of the other common methods is preferred when the focus is on jugging theoretical knowledge.

For example

, some in it companies theoretical knowledge is very important because employees have to send an email to their clients.

Last

but not least, there is their source and after the

interview

first

written test

second

group discussion and final an

interview

. To conclude, I agree that

interview

is a reliable method because without an

interview

employees do not get a candidate's ability.