Paying all workers the same salary in a company promotes harmony and respect among colleagues. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, it has been suggested that providing an equal amount of income to all
the
employees can lead to a homogeneous atmosphere and higher social cohesion. Yet, there remains a contentious debate as to whether can Correct article usage
apply
this
phenomenon be a beneficial step or a destructive scenario. I partially disagree with this
topic and will support my idea with more details and practical examples.
Firstly
, this
process can result in a significant drop in motivation among the team. In addition
, this
is an indisputable fact that different levels of income can make a competitive situation for all the operatives to try harder and reach higher efficiency for a better economic condition; however
, providing the same financial incentive for all workers can harm this
influential procedure. For instance
, operators will have lower enthusiasm to work harder as there is no additional perk or promotion; it has an insurmountable impact on the overall
outcome and revenue of the company. Consequently
, having an equal monetary condition for staff can omit the importance of competition; also
, the organization will suffer from the possible consequences, particularly lack
of initiative and motivation.
Correct article usage
a lack
On the other hand
, neither discrimination nor bias will appear in the working environment. Regarding the fact that all the initiatives will be treated equally, there would be a safe and balanced condition for everyone to accentuate their tasks and project
without being anxious about possible income fluctuations. One particularly salient example is the case when all the personnel are working on different parts of a project and try to share their ideas and aid each other without the afraid of being betrayed for better financial promotions. Fix the agreement mistake
projects
Thus
, a more reliable situation will be established for the team to focus on their responsibilities and contribute more to the total efficiency of the company.
As a way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm that building this
situation for employees can lead to higher trustworthiness as well as
better reliability among the workers, but no competition means no effort for higher efficiency which can strongly affect the organization. In other words
, it is highly recommended to have cognitive processes for the operators to keep the harmony rather than paying the same incomes.Submitted by mortaza.ghamari on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
Ensure that your essay directly addresses the question and fully explores the extent to which you agree or disagree. Include an introduction, body paragraphs that support your position, and a conclusion to summarize your views.
coherence cohesion
Improve the logical flow and coherence between paragraphs. Use cohesive devices and linking words to connect ideas and ensure the essay flows smoothly from one point to the next.