Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so. Consider the arguments from both aspects of this possible debate, and reach a conclusion
#employers #offer #employees #membership #gyms #sports #clubs #staff #work #benefit #arguments #aspects #debate #conclusion
Employers are always seeking ways to enhance their employees’ productivity, and subsidising healthy pursuits may be one way of achieving that. There are arguments on both sides that should be taken into consideration.
On the one hand, it might be said that if workers take bonuses to visit sports and entertainment halls,it will help them to be fitter and less stressed. Surely, in
this
case, their working time will be more efficient, leading to higher levels of output and service. Furthermore
, the work and life balance of the staff will hopefully be improved because their leisure time will be more fulfilling. These may even be more motivating than pay increments, perks, or financial rewards such
as incentives which may be hard to attain. Many employees who do sports and exercises on daily
basis claim that they feel healthier and more energetic during the day and are satisfied with their job.
Correct article usage
a daily
Conversely
, the problem with leisure-based subsidies is that their efficacy is virtually impossible to quantify. For example
, with target-related payments, employers can at least see whether the objectives are reached or not. It might also
be said that, if a budget was spent on extra training for workers or day release programmes, the employees would achieve better career progression and have better job prospects. These matters are all easier to measure, especially in performance reviews and appraisals, and may even help to reduce the risk of redundancy if the company restructures, downsizes or outsources its workforce.
In conclusion, it seems that, while
health-related subsidies are superficially attractive, the lack of measurability is a substantial drawback. Spending funds on ongoing training would appear to be a better use of company or Human Resources budgets.Submitted by ayperixudaybergenova on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
Your essay addresses the prompt and provides well-supported arguments from both perspectives. However, make sure to fully address the 'consider both aspects of the debate' instruction by giving equal attention to both sides of the argument.
coherence cohesion
Your essay shows good coherence and cohesion overall. Consider using transition words and phrases to improve the flow between sentences and paragraphs. Additionally, ensure that your conclusion effectively summarizes the main points of your argument.