Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that an interview is not in reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do - you agree or disagree?

it is argued that there must be another method
such
as written tests, group discussions and so on rather than taking interviews. I disagree to a large extent. There is one reason why I believe that other methods should be there because by taking other exams
such
as written tests and group discussions we get to know the ability of candidates to handle the capacity of work and situations. When a candidate appears for group discussion he/she
evolved
Wrong verb form
evolves
show examples
in all sorts of situations because the company gives many kinds of situations in which they have to give their opinion, but it is a written test they got problem-solving questions which give a few stressful to their mind but it is not the appropriate method because candidate talk help from other to solve these tests.
However
, I
also
believe that by taking an interview the HR of the company get to know more about the candidate by interacting with him/ her. In , an interview there is face-to-face interaction with the employees from which personality traits can be judged.
Also
by asking some case study-type questions, employees can judge traits like the ability to handle pressure, confidence and the ability to think outside of the box.
To conclude
, I agree that other methods have their own pros and cons, I strongly believe that by taking interviews we get to know more about the employee.
Submitted by nikitakumari on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Coherence and cohesion
Ensure a clear introduction and conclusion that address the prompt directly.
Coherence and cohesion
Develop a more structured and organized approach to the essay. Ensure that ideas are logically connected and supported.
Task achievement
Provide more specific examples and support for your arguments to strengthen your response.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: