Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender?

It is widely perceived that

women

and

men

possess diverse advantages and disadvantages. Some

consequently

believe that

gender

should be a selection criterion for several occupations. Others argue that

gender

should not become a restriction. In my point of view,

evaluation

Correct article usage

the evaluation

show examples

of competency should be based on abilities rather than

gender

. The field of science

were

Change the verb form

was

show examples

dominated by

men

, and

therefore

the devotions made by

women

are often neglected.

For example

, in the twentieth century, Watson and Crick were awarded the Nobel Prize for solving the double helix structure of DNA.

However

, they would not have had the inspiration if Rosalind Franklin, a female biochemist, had not conducted X-ray diffraction on DNA molecules.

This

implied that

women

could contribute as much as

men

in the area which most people believe only

men

were able to excel.

Although

there are fundamental differences between

men

and

women

due to

body composition, it is not the reason to completely exclude

women

from certain professions.

Men

are naturally born with more muscles and

thus

more physical strength.

Women

can barely defeat

men

in sports, which,

however

, does not mean a woman would never be a talented athlete. It is the capability that defines competency, not

gender

. In conclusion, in the era of

gender

equality, everyone has the right to develop their own career regardless of their sex. People should discard

gender

stereotypes and stop judging others by their

gender

. Supposing every gifted person dedicates themselves to the corresponding profession, it would benefit social progress and make the world a better place.