The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
DUE TO
THİS TABLE, WE CAN SEE SEVERAL KIND OF FAMILY.THEY WERE LIVING IN AUSTRALIA AND LIVING IN POVERTY.
FIRSTLY
THE TYPE OF SINGLE-AGED PERSON IS GIVEN IN THİS SCHEDULE.THİS WAS 6 PERCENT,THAT WAS 54000 PERSONS
.THIS
PEOPLE WERE AGED BUT HAVE NO FAMILY.THE SECOND ONE
WAS AGED PEOPLE,IT INCLUDED BOTH SINGLE AND MARRIED ONES.THIS
WAS 4 PERCENT,SO 48000 PERSONS
.THIRD ONE
WAS SINGLE PERSONS
HOWEVER
DIDN’T HAVE ANY CHILDREN
.THE PERCENTAGE OF THIS
WAS 19 %, WHICH COVERED 359000 PERSONS
.THERE WAS LOWER POVERTY AMONG THE COUPLE
,WHO HAD NO CHILDREN
.IT WAS ONLY 7 %.BUT IT’S NOT BELONG TO SOLE PARENT.ITS PERCENTAGE WAS THREE TIMES MORE THAN COUPLE
WITHOUT CHILDREN
.THE OTHER ONE
WAS COUPLE
WITH CHILDREN
,TYPICAL FAMILY.ITS PERCENTAGE WAS TWO TIMES MORE THAN THE TYPE OF SINGLE AGED PERSON AND THREE TIMES MORE THAN THE KIND OFBAGED COUPLE
.THE LAST
ONE
WAS ALL HOUSEHOLDS,THIS
INCLUDES ALL OF THEM.ITS RATE WAS 11%.
OVERALL
THE TABLE WE CAN SAY THAT PEOPLE WERE LIVING IN LESS POVERTY THAN COUPLES.Submitted by Ayan on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Introduction: The introduction is missing.
▼
Introduction: Change the first sentence in the introduction.
▼
Introduction: The chart intro is missing.
▼
Contractions: Don't use contractions.
▼
Introduction: The chart intro is missing.
▼
Vocabulary: Replace the words persons, one, children, couple with synonyms.
▼
Vocabulary: Only 3 basic words for charts were used.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "table" was used 2 times.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "percentage" was used 3 times.
▼