lnterviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom lo employ and there are other better methods. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Recruiting new
employees
can be a long and painful process. Some employers conduct interviews
to select new workers. I disagree with the given statement, which says that interviews
are not a reliable method
, and other methods
are better. I believe that interviewing is a reliable method
, but there are many other methods
which are equally good, and the choice is on the recruiters as to which method
they find suitable for their needs.
There are many reasons why interviews
are preferred by some employers for hiring new employees
. Firstly
, by the interview, the recruiters can get an idea about the personality and social skills of the potential employees
. In interviews
, there is face-to-face interaction and the candidates have to answer impromptu questions, from which personality traits
can be judged. Also
, by asking some case study type
questions, Add a hyphen
study-type
employees
can judge traits
like ability
to handle pressure, confidence and Add an article
the ability
ability
to think outside the box.
Correct article usage
the ability
However
, there are many other selection methods
with varied advantages. One of other
common Add an article
the other
methods
is written test
. Fix the agreement mistake
tests
This
method
is preferred when the focus is on judging the theoretical knowledge of the person. Another conventional selection basis is group discussion. This
method
is good where a major job requirement of the company is conversational skills, for instance
, sales
jobs. Group discussion can determine the convincing power of an individual. Change preposition
in sales
Last
but not least, there can be a combination of all the
three Correct article usage
apply
methods
, like written tests, followed by group discussion and finally
interviews
. This
method
is the most thorough of all the methods
, checking everything from personality traits
to knowledge and communication ability.
It is evident that different methods
have different advantages and the best method
cannot be singled out. It depends upon the situation. For example
, interviews
assess a person’s individual traits
better, whereas
written tests are more about knowledge and expertise in an area. There are shortcomings in every method
too. For example
, there is a chance of personal bias in interviews
. The combination of methods
can take too long to select a candidate and may be too expensive to conduct for small companies.
To conclude
, hiring
Correct article usage
the hiring
method
depends upon the job and company’s
needs. In some situations, conducting Correct article usage
the company’s
interviews
is more apt, whereas
in some situations the other methods
may be more advantageous.Submitted by ayeshaf1339 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Task Achievement
Your essay nicely addresses the prompt by effectively discussing both sides of the argument. However, to improve your task achievement score, ensure that you directly address the extent to which you agree or disagree with the given statement throughout the essay, rather than only in the introduction. This will make your position clearer to the reader.
Coherence and Cohesion
You have structured your essay well with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, which has positively impacted your score for coherence and cohesion. To improve further, ensure that you use a wider range of linking words and phrases to enhance the logical flow of ideas between paragraphs and within them.
Task Achievement & Coherence and Cohesion
You provided relevant examples to support your points, which is good. However, to improve task achievement and coherence, aim to include more specific examples or real-world scenarios to back your arguments. This will make your essay more convincing and engaging.
Word Count
IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.
A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.
Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.