The given table demonstrates the amount of deviation between different family types who were underprivileged in Australia throughout 1999.
Overall
, the percentage of sole parents was the most dominant number, followed by single with no Linking Words
children
type which was the second highest. Use synonyms
additionally
, the type of aged couple suffered from the lowest quota. Unit is measured in percentage
Linking Words
According to
the table, there was a small gap between the number of sole parents and single with no Linking Words
children
at 21% and 19%, respectively. Use synonyms
Otherwise
, the chunk of Linking Words
couples
with Use synonyms
children
stood at 12% living in poverty. Use synonyms
Moreover
, the percentage of all households has a similar sum to the Linking Words
amount
of Change the quantifier
number
couples
with Use synonyms
children
which underwent 11%.
Notwithstanding, the lowest number could be seen in aged Use synonyms
couples
which was tolerated at 4%. There was 7% of the sum of Use synonyms
couples
with no babies. Similar to the single aged person which the quantity was 6% in 1999Use synonyms