Most high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 per cent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women. To what extent do you agree

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
In the contemporary era, despite women accounting for above half of
employees
Add an article
the employees
show examples
who work in firms in numerous first-world countries, they are not selected for managerial occupations. Some people disclose that establishments should dedicate a specific percentage of their vacancies to women. I wholeheartedly disagree with
this
idea because
this
policy
leads to a deficiency of men’s motivation to work, and the productivity of
companies
is prone to a dramatic decrease
by
Change preposition
apply
show examples
carrying out
this
policy
. On the one hand, whenever men who work in
companies
witness
this
unfair performance, they do not have an adequate tendency to do their best for
companies
Correct article usage
the companies
show examples
. Indeed, it is a normal consequence of inequality in regulation that can cause much dissatisfaction among members of the public.
For instance
, all
psycologists
Correct your spelling
psychologists
underscore the importance of the promotion for enhancing the quality of staff’s activities in the workplace, so
this
regulation performs exactly the opposite of psychologists’ opinions.
Hence
, it has detrimental effects on men.
On the other hand
, the output of
companies
decreases because of
this
wrong
policy
.
Due to
recruiting
the
Correct article usage
a
show examples
workforce who do not have sufficient capabilities to manage sources of company, the quality and amount of goods that are manufactured by these
companies
that follow
this
policy
decline. For a prime example, some universities,
such
as Stanford accept students who are female owing to the diversity issue, so it can be seen the rank of
this
university has declined with the passage of time. In conclusion, not only does
this
rule not have benefits, but it
also
creates several crises, like a negative impact on men’s spirits, and it affects the production of
companies
.
Hence
, employing
this
rule is not a logical activity.
Submitted by speher2000behroozifar on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Clarify and elaborate on the consequences of not implementing the policy, ensuring each point is fully explored with specific examples or evidence supporting your claims.
coherence and cohesion
Use more transition signals between ideas or paragraphs to enhance the flow of the essay, and ensure each paragraph shows a clear link back to the main argument.
coherence and cohesion
The essay includes a clear introduction that outlines the main points to be discussed, setting a clear focus for the essay.
coherence and cohesion
Logical progression of ideas is noticeable throughout the essay, making the argument easy to follow for the reader.
coherence and cohesion
The conclusion succinctly summarizes the main points discussed, effectively closing the argument.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Gender diversity
  • Affirmative action
  • Meritocracy
  • Quotas
  • Glass ceiling
  • Legal enforcement
  • Tokenism
  • Voluntary measures
  • Career progression
  • Representation
  • Workforce parity
  • Backlash
  • Historical imbalances
  • Corporate governance
  • Inclusive practices
  • Boardroom dynamics
  • Gender norms
  • Unconscious bias
  • Regulatory frameworks
  • Corporate ladder
What to do next:
Look at other essays: