Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There has been a debate about the suitable method for selecting an employee for big industries. Some
people
Use synonyms
are in favour of interviews, others believe that it is not the best way to choose a worker. I
also
Linking Words
agree with the latter viewpoint, one method is not always reliable they should consider other approaches too. The first reason behind
this
Linking Words
phenomenon is some
people
Use synonyms
do not perform well during the interviews. They might feel pressure to answer the questions. There are few
people
Use synonyms
who lack communication skills but they might be best when they perform their tasks.
However
Linking Words
, during face-to-face conversation,
this
Linking Words
lack of skill could result in not selection of a person who could be the best in the task performance.
Secondly
Linking Words
, the criteria for every vacancy are different. There are a few roles
such
Linking Words
as doctors and nurses. These jobs require practical ways to judge a person's ability to perform actual tasks. If these professionals receive jobs only on the basis of one method and after that, they fail to perform actual job duties. It could be harmful to
people
Use synonyms
.
Therefore
Linking Words
, organisations should rely on other ways too. In my view, companies should select a blended approach
such
Linking Words
as checking the social media platform of a citizen to know the background details.
Also
Linking Words
, they should use assessment centres where critical thinking and problem-solving skills can be checked by giving them real work duties on the spot.
This
Linking Words
mixed approach could help employers to find suitable employees.
To conclude
Linking Words
, some notions believe that interviews are not a reliable way to hire an employee,
while
Linking Words
others are in favour of
this
Linking Words
.
However
Linking Words
, I believe that management should conduct a hiring with a mix of techniques to build a better team.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Add more clear examples to support your main points.
coherence
Use clearer topic sentences at the start of each paragraph.
cohesion
Make sure to connect your ideas with linking words for better flow.
positive
Good structure with clear introduction and conclusion.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: