The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

✍️ Want to check your own essay?Try for free →
The table illustrates the percentage of several family types living in poor conditions in Australia in 1999. As can be seen from the graph, sole parents and singles without kids had the highest proportion of people living in poverty.
While
Linking Words
the aged couples and singles had the lowest. Out of old households combined, about one-tenth were living in poverty. Turning to the details,
while
Linking Words
both singles, with and without children, had the highest proportion of scarcity out of all six categories, approximately 1/5. Couples with children have been the most common in terms of number of people, 933,000 individuals, which
took the
Verb problem
made up
show examples
half of all households combined.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, mature adults, both with and without a partner, had the lowest percentage at 6% and 4%
respectively
Punctuation problem
, respectively
show examples
.
Moreover
Linking Words
, they showed the lowest quantity of individuals in general, with 102,000 individuals combined. Couples with no kids had one of the most minimal proportion, 7%, and a substantial number of people at the same time (211,000)

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Linking words: Don't use the same linking words: "while".
Conclusion: The conclusion is too long.
Vocabulary: The word "number of" was used 2 times.
Vocabulary: The word "percentage" was used 2 times.
Vocabulary: The word "proportion" was used 3 times.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: