Some employers of er their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staf healthier and thus more ef ective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so. Consider the arguments from both aspects of this possible debate, and reach a conclusion.

Employers are always seeking ways to enhance their employees’ productivity, and
subsidising
Suggestion
Subsidising
healthy pursuits may be one way of achieving
this
Linking Words
. There are arguments on both sides,
Linking Words
however
Suggestion
However
, which we will discuss here. On the one hand, it might be said that if workers are fitter and less stressed, their working time
will
Suggestion
Will
be more efficient, leading to higher levels of output and service.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, the work/life balance of the staff will hopefully be improved, because their leisure time will be more fulfilling.
This
Linking Words
may even be more motivating than pay increments, perks, or financial rewards
such
Linking Words
as bonuses or incentives which may be hard to attain.
Finally
Linking Words
, feeling healthier may lead to better job
satisfaction which is in
Suggestion
satisfaction which is
itself a motivating factor.
Conversely
Linking Words
, the problem with
such
Linking Words
leisure-based subsidies is that their efficacy is virtually impossible to quantify.
For example
Linking Words
, with target-related payments, employers can at least see
whether
Suggestion
Whether
the objectives are reached or not. It might
also
Linking Words
be said that, if
this
Linking Words
budget was spent on (
for instance
Linking Words
) on the job training or day release programmes, the employees would achieve better career progression and have better job prospects. These matters are all easier to measure, especially in performance reviews and appraisals, and may even help to reduce the risk of redundancy if the company restructures, downsizes or outsources its workforce. Overall, it seems that, while health-related subsidies are superficially attractive, the lack of
measurability
Suggestion
Measurability
is a substantial drawback. Spending funds
on
Suggestion
for
ongoing training would appear to be a better use of company or Human Resources budgets.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: