Nowadays, when applying for work, you are obligated to engage in an interview as a trial to determine whether you are a valuable asset to a company's firm. But recently, I
find
that Wrong verb form
found
this
method of choosing workers is quite insubstantial because of how little evidence is provided to entrust new individuals, which will be Linking Words
further
elaborated and clipped with a hypothetical solution.
Linking Words
Firstly
, an employer's duty is to seek out the best-performing individuals to be admitted into their department. Their judgement is incredibly influential in affecting the outcome, Linking Words
however
, they are flawed opinions. Fundamentally, interviews are simply too vague to fully determine a talent because they are only supported by words and not actions, which leads to devastating results. Linking Words
For example
, a person could show a good demeanour but lack the skills needed for the task.
Linking Words
Therefore
, I propose a hypothesis for employers to select their future peers more successfully and Linking Words
that is
to experience first-hand their working capability. The solution is to offer them a temporary internship position for a limited period of time. Let them show their strengths by permitting them to work as a regular employee. Linking Words
Consequently
, it is easier to identify and choose an upcoming soon-to-be-employee by doing Linking Words
this
. Linking Words
Additionally
, Linking Words
this
method will reveal more about the workers, which will be very helpful for employers.
In conclusion, choosing a valuable asset for a company is extremely arduous and at times untrustworthy. People can easily contradict themselves more often than not; which is why I think that Linking Words
this
solution will prove definitively if an individual is either qualified or not.Linking Words
havu06