Some people believe that decent income should be paid for most of the artists by the government because they earn low salary which is not enough to make a living. I disagree with this point of view because artists have f
There is no doubt,most of the art form are diminishing owing to their low popularity in these days. Hence,Art's performer might not to proceed with their profession as they are getting few amount of pay through it; howev
Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+
Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words. Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!
Many people are of the opinion that artists who do not earn a decent income should be supported by the union. I do not agree with this point of view because I believe ministry funding should be spent on pressing social p
With the proliferation of technology, the heritage of a country can only be preserved with its art and culture. Though many people have lost interest and love in the art, there is a plethora of artists who have dedicated
With the revolution of computer graphics, most of the creative job has been digitalised. The major advancement of technology is time. Art works which required months to complete are now done within few hours, rendering t
It is known that art occupies an important place in ancient and modern societies. However, The incomes of such a job are very low and artists often are unable to continue their work without additional financial resources
There is a school of thought that most art professions do not reach lucrative and their struggle for the living. Hence the state should be given back to continue with their avenues.I believe that it is justifiable to agr
In this capitalistic world, everything is monetized and art is no exception. Society, these days, is abuzz over a debate that the majority of artists are not adequately paid for their craft. Hence, the government should
Most artists earn low salaries and should therefore receive funding from the government in order for them to continue with their work. To what extent do you agree?
In this capitalistic world, everything is monetized and art is no exception. Society, these days, is abuzz over a debate that the majority of artists are not adequately paid for their work. Hence, government should inte
Many people are of the opinion that artists who do not earn a decent income should be supported by the government. I do not agree with this point of view because I believe government funding should be spent on pressing s
Artists are not well recognized in some countries, as they should have been. It is debated that the artists having low salaries, should receive government fundings encourgaing them to continue their work and lead a norm
It is argued that art is considered as the least earning profession which makes it difficult for artists to proceed with their work hence the government ought to support artists financially. I would agree that the state
Some people think most artist earns very low salary and hence they should receive funding form, the government in order to continue their work. I strongly disagree with the statement as most of the artist get help from n
Art is a part of human life, in many countries, people preserve their arts for upcoming generations. Some people believe that the government should provide aid to the artists in order to make them sustain in their field.
Nowadays, artists are not earning enough money to fulfill their needs. Some people suggest providing financial assistance to them. However, this may be of little help, but I am a strong opponent of this idea.
Artists' play an imperative role in human civilization.Although the artists have less wage compared to other sectors, but they have support from non-profit organisations, and with the advent of technology they are recogn
The government is responsible for funding the arts because most artists do not make enough money to support themselves. In my opinion, I strongly agree that the government ought to support artists as it will greatly brin