The idea is that people who belong to art backgrounds are equally essential in a society like scientists. I completely agree with this statement as well as all reasonable points will be elaborated on in the upcoming para
It is argued that those who entertain people are far more paramount than experimentalists. This essay disagrees with the statement because it would be impossible to have such a convenient life without the inventions done
In the modern world, some people think artists such as singers and comedian are more important than compared to researchers. I partly agree with the above statement as I believe both the parties are equally need in our l
Our world in 21th century is developed by many scientists and artists. Although, It is undeniable that some people may think artist are less important than the scientist. From my point of view, I strongly disagree with t
Nowadays, both the entertainment and the science industries are flourishing. Many people argue that entertainers deserve more recognition than scientist, while others glorify scientists. As far as I am concerned, science
I really disagree with the pharase that entertainers and scientists, I feel scientists has more importance than entertainers as they works with high degree of responsibility and have to answer in case of any failure. Sci
Recently there has been a public debate of whether the sphere of entertainment is far more valuable than the scientific one. Since two of these fields are extremely controversy they cannot easily be confronted. However,
Recently there has been a public debate of whether the sphere of entertainment is far more valuable than the scientific one. Since two of these fields are extremely contraversive they cannot easily be confronted. However
It is often argued that entertainers are more influential and prime characters of the society by many people. However, I believe that scientists have greater importance than entertainers.
It is argued that artists are more paramount as compared to researchers. It is disagreed that scientists are less important than entertainers because inventions play a vital role for the prosperity of a nation. This essa
Many people consider movie stars and other eminent celebrities more valuable than scientists. To them, these personalities are contributing more to the society. But, I opine that their perspective is completely wrong as
Many people argue that entertainers are more significant than scientists for a society. In my opinion, the benefits of scientists are much more crucial for the humanity due to their inventions which have facilitated huma
From the topic I choose to disagree that entertainers are more important than scientist and I will give reasons with each paragraph. Before we begin, we need to know who is an entertainer and who is a scientist .
It is often argued that entertainers are more popular than the scientists. However the importances of entertainers such as film stars, comedians cannot be defined with popularity and fame. Some people believe that in tod
It is believed by some folks that Entertainers play a vital role in today’s life than the Scientists. Although, Entertainment has become a necessity in today’s life, yet I don’t think Entertainers contributes much to soc