People living in the 21st century have a better quality of life than the previous centuries. The charts illustrate how water was used for different agricultural products in Australia in 2004 and how much income these products generated for the national economy in the same year. Overall, livestock and dairy used the largest proportion of water, while fruit contributed the highest share of income. In contrast, some products consumed a lot of water but produced relatively low economic value. Looking first at water usage, livestock accounted for the biggest share at 35%. Dairy farming was the second largest user, making up 19% of total water consumption. Cotton also used a considerable amount of water, at 15%. Fruit and sugar used 11% and 10% respectively, while rice and vegetables consumed the least water, with only 5% and 4%. However, the pattern for income was quite different. Fruit generated the highest income at 48%, despite using only a moderate amount of water. Dairy was the second most valuable product, contributing 24% of total income. Cotton accounted for 13%, followed by sugar at 7% and livestock at just 6%. Rice and vegetables provided the smallest economic returns, each making up only a small percentage.
DECEMBER 14
Part 1: The charts below show the use of water for
agriculture
Replace the word
agricultural
show examples
products in Australia in 2004 and
Correct article usage
the values
show examples
values
Fix the agreement mistake
value
show examples
of these products to the Australian economy in the same year.
Part 2: In many parts of the world, children are given more freedom than in the past. Is
this
Linking Words
a positive or negative development?
#writing
📩 @cdireport_admin
🔗 cdireport.t.me
musabekovaferuza50
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Linking words: Add some linking words.
▼
Linking words: Add more linking words.
▼
Introduction: The introduction is missing.
▼
Introduction: Change the first sentence in the introduction.
▼
Introduction: The chart intro is missing.
▼
Basic structure: Add more body paragraphs.
▼
Common mistake: Your writing should be 150-250 words.
Introduction: The chart intro is missing.
▼
Vocabulary: Only 3 basic words for charts were used.
▼
Vocabulary: Use several vocabularies to present the data in the first paragraph.
▼
Vocabulary: Use several vocabularies to present the data in the fourth paragraph.
▼
Vocabulary: Use several vocabularies to present the data in the fifth paragraph.
▼
Vocabulary: Use several vocabularies to present the data in the sixth paragraph.
over the past few decades, change has been ubiquitous. While some sections of society would rather stick to their daily routine, others embrace it with open hearts. Although the arguments on both sides are valid, I vehemently support the latter group.
It is true that editors have to make difficult decisions about which news stories they broadcast or publish, and their choices are no doubt influenced by a variety of factors. In my opinion, we are exposed to too much bad news, and I would welcome a greater emphasis on good news.
It is true that the way people live nowadays is absolutely different from the one they lived in the past. While some citizens are of the opinion that changes have been very beneficial, others are convinced that they have been disadvantageous.
It happens in a common trajectory that the public who stick to a specific path of business early in their lives are inclined to live a delightful working life than those who often switch various jobs. In my opinion, although a perpetual career path is significant to one's success, the experience of trying different jobs helps lead to a more desirable working life.
One of the most pressing challenges we face as a society is pollution. While there are various sources of contamination, vehicle emissions, mainly CO2, rank at the top of the list. Some argue that government investment in mass transit systems and lower ticket prices could effectively mitigate this issue. I wholeheartedly agree; initiatives aimed at creating eco-friendly public transportation systems and promoting their use at reduced prices would likely encourage more individuals to opt for public transit instead of relying on their cars.