People have different opinions that a jury should receive a defendant’s past criminal record before they make their decision about the case. In my view, I disagree with this viewpoint, I will discuss my views in this ess
According to British and Australian legislation judge, members are not allowed to access past defendant misdeeds to safeguard the convicts, However, some connoisseurs proposed a change of the rule, permitting the jury
Britain and Australia implement a law that a panel of judges in criminal case should have no access about the suspect’s illegal records. Since this will give protection to the person who was being alleged of the offence.
The importance of success is the best measure for intelligence which was always debatable Has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial
It is a fact that some law professionals object to the British and Australian law that the jury has no entrance to the criminal record of the denfendants. In my opinion, I agree with the changing the law.
Several barristers supposed that all the defendant's past criminal records should be given to a jury before they make a decision about the particular illegal case. While this may work to a certain extent, I think it also
For under British and Australia law, lawyers and judges has no access to information about the past of the criminal and it is sometimes started that people with a prior convictitions should not be disclosed by jubges sin
It is believed that a jury ought to be provided all the information about the past facts of offender. While this may work to a certain extent, I would argue that this issue also has dark sides.
Law juries in the United Kingdom and Australia can not be permitted to approach the previous criminal history of accused people. However, some legal professionals call for a change in this process. They expressed their o
The lawyers have different views that all defendant's criminal records including the past records should be accessed by the jury for the most suitable decision, while the British and Australian laws should be customized
The law in both the United kingdom and Australia prohibits juries to get information on the defendant's past criminal records by doing this they believe it protects offenders from being accused and giving them a fair ver
There is a long-standing debate about whether all the previous history including the defender's past record should be shared with jury members under British and Australian laws or not. Some lawyers claimed that extra in
The law court process in different countries follows different rules, however there are some practices, that, I believe, should be unified accross the globe for all criminal cases. In my opinion, the information of the d
There is a debate among civilians regarding the jury getting authorisation to go through the defendant's past criminal past. Many give different opinions from various perspectives as some support the statements and some
The criminal record of the accused in Britain or Australia is secured. Due to certain important data coming from an existing record of the accused, some legal experts are pressing for the jury to have access to the parti
In conclusion, the media of today—especially the Internet—influences behaviour. It is an aggressive and pervasive form of media propaganda. the consumption of pornographic material or media with violent imagery and conte
these days you see a disagreement between the laws in UK and AUS. so some of them think that helpful for the person who presented, while others believe that has big damage for them. this essay will discuss both sides and
People who to do in crime based on British and Australian rules get some protection about their record. But it is good from lawyers because it is against that rule. Of course I agree that the informations about the crimi
Legislation in Great Britain and Australia does not allow to the judges to get any personal data, as far as people who have commited a crime are concerned. One part of the attorneys believe that people of law should be a
I agree on that the jury should investigate all the defendant's history before making the judgment because I think that if the defendant is done nothing wrong they do not have to be afraid of the past that will against t