It is evident that some nations have prohibited the act of smoking tobacco in commercial buildings. However, there is an argument to this decision as not all nations are declaring such laws. This essay will discuss both views and come out with a decisive conclusion.
Smoking at public place has banned in many countries whereas there are some countries still allow their public to continue without any punishment. Society is divided into two regarding this topic.In my opinion ,I strongly believe that public smoking has to be punished.
Improve your band scores without paying for expensive tutoring
Writing9 scans your text for all types of mistakes, from typos to sentence structure problems and beyond.
Now a day we can see in many public places, a poster or sign of "no tobacco/no smoking" is put up. Some countries feel that it is important to have laws against smoking in public places like restaurant, movie theatres, etc., On contrary to this many thinks that it is not needed. In this essay I would discuss both sides and conclude with my opinions.
Due to the health effects of smoking, some states consider banning smoking in public constructions, such as, hospitals, offices and restaurants. Albeit, the negative impacts of smoking, other countries do not take an action against this issue. We will consider both sides of the debate in this essay.
Smoking has became a major concern in many industrialized territories nowadays and there should be an enacted rules to overcome such situation in social places. Some countries are not keen to take part and impose laws opposed to smoking in such places. We will consider both sides of the discussion in this essay.
In this decade, the consumption of tobacco has risen in popularity. People consider it to be the sign of richness, but it is no more than an evil sin. I, think abandoning it is necessary at places like work, hotels. This essay delve to explore both the aspects to finally form an opinion.
In this decade, some countries ensure smoking have a dread impact on people health and they enact laws against smoking in public places like office and restaurant. Other do not take part in this matter. We will argue both side of discussion in this essay.
Around the world, there are some states implemented a law prohibiting smoking in such places as offices and restaurants, whereas other states prefer to do anything to tackle this issue. It appears that both supporters and opponents have their right persuasions.
Todays, the harmful effects of smoking on direct smokers as well as passive ones who breath cigarette smoke is well-known. Many countries have enacted laws to forbid smoking in public places while others do not tend to follow. In this essay, both sides of discussion will be debated.
Today, the harmful effects of smoking on direct smokers and passive ones who breathe cigarette smoke are well-discussed. Many countries have enacted laws to forbid smoking in public places while others do not tend to follow. In this essay, both sides of the discussion will be debated and reach a conclusion.
In many countries, smoking tobacco in public places is forbidden by the law while other countries have no purpose of doing it. However it is against human rights, it also affects others' health in a negative way and can be the cause of increasing serious diseases. We will discuss both sides of the topic.
By raising the number of smokers, some countries have passed laws against smoking in public areas such as offices and restaurants. However, other countries do not have the same attitude. The essay will discuss both views and conclude.