A large part of government revenue comes from income tax, so taxpayers expect governments to use these money wisely in the necessary places. Recently, debates about whether governments should invest money in the arts have raised people's interest, as some people worried that this is a waste of money and future tax rate will increase as governments are more likely to be in budget deficit. In my opinion, a nation's culture can be conveyed and expressed through arts performance like theatre and music, so it is worth investing using tax revenue.
The allocation of and judicious expenditure of public funds is a lingering topical issue for governments around the world today. Although I agree that it is important to spend money on public services, I do not think money spent on the arts is a useless venture.
While some people believe that goverment purchase in the arts, such as music, theatre and visual profession is gain less benefits and goverment investment in public service must gain more benefits. From my point of view, I agree with this idea for many reasons, described in the following essay.
Investment in the arts has always been debated and belittling for its monetary benefits in comparison to the public service merit it holds. I believe that even though it doesn't weigh well as a public service but it definitely holds higher value, with respect to the economy, profession, development and moral boosters for the citizens.
Every year, Government amass hefty amount on account of taxes and other service charges which they tend to spend in several ways. There are split opinions regarding the spending by Government. Some people believe that the resources invested by government on activities like arts and music are useless. I partially agree to the given statement, due to several reasons. In this essay, I intend to delve into the pros and cons of government investment on music and arts.
Government of developed countries has a great contribution in investing and managing resources effectively and efficiently. Some people believe that investment of country resources in services industries will be beneficial instead of ruining it into entertainment. However, I will also slightly agree with the laid statement that after spending money on the basic necessities of life; the government should deploy resources on music, arts and other recreational activities which will be explained in further paragraphs.
Government support is indeed needed by every organization, whether it may be for health, for food or may it be for entertainment al these have their implications in the life of an individual. Some people think government should allocate more funds to public services rather than in the arts which may be a waste for the society. I agree with this statement to some extent. This essay will emphasise on the reasons why both are important to our society.
The government of developed countries has a great contribution to investing and managing resources effectively and efficiently. Some people believe that investment in-country resources in services industries will be beneficial instead of ruining it into entertainment. However, I will also slightly agree with the laid statement that after spending money on the basic necessities of life; the government should deploy resources on music, arts, and other recreational activities which will be explained in further paragraphs.
Some people believe that governments should fund development of public services rather than invest in arts like cinemas, ballet and music which are considered to be a misuse of money. This essay will agree with this opinion because efficient public services benefit a large proportion of the society. Additionally, unlike the arts, services such as hospitals and railways have a lasting effect on the welfare of communities.
Art is considered to be the main core of the country’s civilization and heritage. However, this type of science could attract people all over the world, so the governments have paid much more wealth for it rather than the significant daily services for the general population. In my point of view, government should cover all essential services financially then they could pay attention to other entertained arts and theatre.
Easthetic performances hardly get funds for the survival. Though a lack on money for the theatre exists, lion's portion of the population thinks the state should spend on public service improvements, instead of arts. This opinion cannot be accepted as art is indeed a becomes a service through the happy moments it can give to people.
According to many people, the investment in art like music and theatre are nothing but causes of money. They believe that this money can be utilized to fulfill the increasing demand for public services like hospitals and schools. I agree with this statement to some extent. This essay will emphasize on the reasons why both are important to our society.
Some people think that investment by the government in arts, like music as well as theatre is a wastage of money and that they should invest money in public services rather than arts.
It is true that the governments around the world spend some resources on the objects of art, such as the theatres and conservatories. Many people consider it as a waste of money, arguing that the authorities should allocate those resources to the public sector. In my opinion, this argument is completely wrong and the arts should be financed even more than now.
In the past decade, our science and technology in the fields of cloning of human beings has grown substantially. Earlier it seemed quite impossible for us to imagine getting spare parts of cloned humans, but now it has become a reality. I personally believe, this modern science can help our society live longer than ever, but it would ultimately prove to be a nightmare for mankind.
These days, the government spends a large proportion of its budget not only on education, healthcare and other public services but also on arts. Although I believe that it is essential to spend money on public services, I do not think that investments in art are waste of money.
It is irrefutable that funding of the entertainment industry by the government is as crucial as investment in public services. I agree that these two serves different purposes and are beneficial to the citizens of society and require government funding.
A common debate in today's society is wheter governments should invest moneys in the arts, building theatres and museums and and organizing events, or not. I am of the opinion that if a country has the economic possibilities it should definitely invest some moneys on the arts. It's a different situation if it's still a developing country without basic services.
Investment from authority is considered as an essential marker for any kind of development in a country, but whether the endowment should be allocated in the service sector or should not be used in music and theatre, is a matter of discussion. I believe that investing money on both sides is essential.
At present, most government spend some part of their budget on not ont public services, but also the arts, such as, music and theatre. In my opinion, although a proportion of government spending should be channeled towards this sector, however, most should be spent on public services.