Public transports such as trains, buses and trams are travel alternatives for those who are going to their workplace, studying at schools or looking to go for a vacation. Many consider that building intercity railways for rapid trains are rather essential though it involves a massive fund to do so; while others regard that improvising the present public transport is more worthwhile. I am more inclined to support the latter as making new railways will be less costly and time consuming for those who need to travel between cities.
There are some people supporting the opinion that countries should not spend their funds on railways and they have to develop existing facilities and old public network.I side with those who opine that dedicate some proportion of budget to extend the railway network and make new ones is essential.
With the proliferation of mobility among people, it is very essential to have an efficient public transport system in every country. Among different modes of transport, some countries budget huge amount of money for sophisticated railway tracks, whereas others only consider improving their current public transport. In my view, it depends on countries' financial capacity and necessity of such advanced mode of transportation.
People have different views as to whether tax should be devoted to fast trains connecting cities or transport public in use. Although it can be argued that investing in high speed trains between cities is essential, I believe that ameliorating current existing public transport is more urgent.
There are split opinions regarding to spend large sum of money. Some people believes that money should be spend on constructing new railways lines for fast trains between cities whereas another group of thinker support that money should be spent on improving existing public transport. However, both has its own pros and cons. Therefore, before commenting on my views, both the opinions would be discussed.
Transport is a vital component of a nation's infrastructure. Some sections of the society advocate the construction of new inter-city railway lines for rapid transit times while others suggest utilising those funds for the betterment of current public transport. This essay will discuss both view points with a concluding opinion.
People from some parts of the world have different views about whether a great amount of funding should be taken for railway construction between cities or for present public transport improvement. While it really helps to meet people's wants if getting newer and faster trains, I believe that reaching people's needs with higher quality of public transportation seems to be quite more pressing and necessary.
It is often argued in some countries that it is essential to fund big amount of money on building new railroad lines for rapid trains between towns. Other people think that instead of financing railroads money ought to be sponsored on development spectacular pubic mode of transport. I completely agree that it is railways that have to be primarily financed as are a faster and more comfortable means of transport.
Due to rapid urbanisation, transportation is closely related to people’s daily lives. In order to build convenient transportation systems, many think that it is necessary for the government to construct numerous high-speed railways. Fast trains can enhance commuters’ travel efficiency and improve connections between cities. However, others think improving current public transportation is more important since it can serve more local citizens.
In many countries nowadays, people argue about the importance of the expenditure on current public transport and new railway lines for high-speed trains. From my point of view, governments should invest in the former rather than the latter.
Many people believe that govenments should spend large amount of money on the construction of high-speed railway lines between cities. However, there are some people claim that it would be better to spend money on improving existing public transprot. While I tend to agree more with the first notion, I realise that there are other aspects to consider. Both points will be discussed in this essay.
In many countries, the train is an important mode of transport. While some people feel that the government should provide funds to build new railway lines to connect many cities, other people argue that the money should instead be spent on the improvement of the current public transport. There are valid views on both sides, which I will discuss now.
Europe has developed its mobility infrastructure since the XVIII century, reaching today to the most optimum transportation way globally. Once deployed the main networks that connected important cities, they carried out a transport means in each city. Thus, from my point of view, it is mandatory to invest such in outer fast lines as an internal system by keeping a balance investment policy.
Rail transportation is one of the fastest and safest means of transportation ever. It is a special way of transport, which every country should develop and maintain. But should it be largely spent on, such that other methods of travelling should be abandoned? This essay will discuss the advantages of maintaining and encouraging the rail transport structure; also, reasons why existing public transport means should not be neglected. In my opinion, money should be equally spent developing all public methods of transportation.
It has been observed in recent years that the number of people using public transport daily in increasing. Thus, as transport is so widely needed, many people believe that government should invest in providing new fast railway lines in order to reduce travel time and traffic. Others believe that it is more important to spend such investment on renewing the current public transport and solve its problems.
Railways are cheapest and easiest form of transportation for people.Therefore, some citizens of many countries believe that officials should build new rail lines and they should spend more fund on creating new tracks.While, the opposition says that the old public shipment must be updated and budget should be higher for that purpose.I will discuss both views and will give my own opinion.
In the recent past, the expansion and innovation in an engineering domain is growing trend. Some people believe that it is required to upgrade the existing railway infrastructure, so that it is ready to incorporate the technology of fast trains, whereas, there is a section of people who think that the same funds should be utilized to provide more security and reliability with existing railway lines. In my opinion, it is important to maintain the balance between both approaches, as the evolution of new technology is not a blocker for enhancement of the existing system.
Introduction: With the pace of life in countries becoming faster and faster in the recent years, a demand for faster and more effective means of public transport is becoming greater than ever. Unsurprisingly, very fast trains would be the solution to this problem, however, constructing new railway lines would cost a ton of money. Some people think that the investment is necessary, whereas others believe that financial resources should be spent to improve the existing public transportation. This essay is going to discuss both views.
In today's world, technological advancements coupled with a strong economy has sparkled the thoughts of many countries as to whether new rail lines for super fast trains should be constructed, or financial revenues must be spent for the betterment of existing public transport. Which one is appropriate in the present day scenario, is a question to be answered.