The table illustrates the grading figures of educational institution students across five different aspects of a particular university between 2000 and 2010. The areas comprise technical quality, print resources, electro
The table provides key information about the percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university over the decade spanning 2000 to 2010.
The table illustrates the results of student surveys conducted in 2000, 2005, and 2010, which measured satisfaction with various aspects of university facilities.
The table illustrates the proportion of students in a university who show good results in studying each course in 2000, 2005, and 2010 . Overall, the percentage of people who are likely to have better ratings is approxim
The table provides key information about the percentage of students who evaluated different university facilities over a period of a decade from 2000 to 2010. The units are measured in percentages.
In the table below, it's shown a summary of survey results about different years regarding students of a certain university. Overall, we can see five different aspects of the university with different percentages of stud
The given table illustrates the percentage of the answers given by students of a university in surveys done in 2000, 2005 and 2010 covering a variety of its aspects.
The given table compares data about the fraction of students who were satisfied from 5 various dimensions of the university at 3 points in time namely, 2000, 2005, and 2010.
The table illustrates the proportion of students who gave good ratings for five different aspects of a university in 2000, 2005 and 2010. At first glance, the print resources and the range of modules offered in order had
The table depicts the percentage of students in an university for various aspects in year 2000, 2005, and 2010. Overall, print resources's category become the most aspects with highest presentation. Otherwise, range of m
The given above table illustrates percentage of student giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in 2000, 2005 and 2010. In general, most vote percentages had not changed but electronic resources increse
The table depicts the outcome of a survey about the particular university with different courses like, Technical Quality, Print Resources, Range of modules offered and Building / teaching Facilities.
The given chart demonstrates how different the percentage of first-year-student assessment is in distinctive aspects of a university from 2000 to 2010.
The information presented in the table indicates the proportion of students who perceived various aspects of the university in the year 2000,2005 and 2010. In general, it is evident that the data in 2010 was higher than