In terms of producing art, artists should be encouraged financially by the government. However, other views say that they have to stand on their own feet. All of the views are going to be discussed along with my opinion.
The issue of government support for artists triggers a discussion between advocates who argue in favor of providing financial assistance and skeptics who perceive it as an unnecessary expenditure of funds This essay will
For many years, a number of nations have been offering subsidy to professional artists. This generosity has been very costly, of course. Has this expenditure been worthwhile or unnecessary?
In today's society, the question of whether governments should allocate financial support to artists, such as painters and musicians, remains a topic of debate. Some argue that it is a waste of taxpayers' money, while ot
Proponents believe that artists such as painters, musicians and poets should be supported by the government in terms of money while opponents believe that is not required. The contradictory views need to be discussed in
The role of the government in financially supporting artists is a contentious issue. While some argue that it is a waste of public funds, others contend that it is essential for the preservation of a country's cultural r
Countries invest a lot of money to artists and some people think that is wasting government’s money and it would be better if it was used in other areas. States could benefit from artists because they pay a lot of taxes,
Art represents the culture and history of a nation and talented artists should be helped finnacially. Few individuals believes that it is government's responsibility while other think that community, educational institue
While some individuals think the government should support that artist, others believe that the political field should not involve them. The following essay takes a look at both sides of the argument.
Some would argue that the money used by the state to support people working in the artistic area is a good option, while others say that this is a big waste and should be used in other places. Although artists need large
Nowadays some individuals consider that the world's rise grow popuplation is unsuitable and would lead to global emergency. While other argue that it is necessary and benefit from increase economic growth and community.
There has been a heated topic of debate as to whether creative artists should be funded by the goverment or it should come from other sources. While i admit that goverment should support for artists, i also believe that
Some people think that the government should allocate funds for other essential sectors such as health care, education, and technology. Others, however, believe that the artists' funding is worthwhile. While some people
Nowadays, due to the globalisation and the spread of social media, people spend less time doing culture activities, like visit museums or enjoy an evening in a theatre. Therefore, many people think that is useless that n
ARTISTS OFTEN RECEIVE A LOT OF MONETARY BENEFITS FROM THE GOVERNMENT.A CERTAIN SECTON OF SOCIETY IS IN FAVOUR OF IT, WHILE OTHERS ARENT.OTHER INDIVIDUALS THINK THAT THE MONEY CAN BE USED FOR BETTER CONCERNS. I SHARE MY O
Nowadays, literature and art have started to become disappeared into the shadow of struggle in personal life. Therefore, some would think that the government should support this artist financially. Whereas, others beli
A bunch of people opine that the regime must invest more money to resolve the pollution problem from the environment whereas others think that lawmakers also give attention to uplifting artistic programs such as music a
It is certainly true that many countries spend money on painters and musicians because they can get a lot of profits for their country. In my opinion, governments do not need to spend money on entertainment and sports. F