The world today is safer place than it was a hundred years ago, and goverments should stop spending large amounts of money on their armed forces. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
These days, technology has been developing really fast, so the world become safer than a century ago; as a result, a group of people advise that governments stop investment in their armies. I subscribe to this idea owing
Today, we are not witnessing the much wars as our granfathers were years ago and the word is a safer place in compare of a few decades ago. Some people beleive that governments should not spend money on army due to the l
Globally, cases of insecurity have diminished and the state should divert the expenditure used on the armed forces to other essential activities. In this essay, I will explain my reasons and give my opinion as well.
Many people believe that, considering the relative security in today's globe compared to a century ago, it is wasteful to devote enormous quantities of money to the military. I disagree with this viewpoint, though, as it
It is argued that nowadays the safety rates throughout the world have witnessed a significant increase over the century, and there is already no need to invest a significant amount of funds in armed forces. While advance
The current state of the world could be considered less dangerous compared to a century ago, and the authorities should spend less money on the armed forces. In this case, I would like to agree with the statement. There
Plenty of individuals argue whether the modern world is more harmless than it was a century ago and whether is a need for authorities to invest most of the budget in the military. I completely disagree with that because
The world is a beautiful place to live for people, and nowadays it is safer than it was years ago. As a citizen of the Earth, I tend to agree that politicians should decrease funds spent on military forces and focus on t
Nowadays,it has been argued that people are living more comfortably and safely compared to before, and the government should decrease its funds on securities.In this essay, I will discuss some reasons why I strongly agre
Luckily society has learned from previous mistakes made and most governments aim to avoid going into war. It doesn’t make sense spending a considerable part of a country’s gross domestic product on weapons. Therefore, I
Most of the countries spend majority of their Gross Development Profund (GDP) to form and maintain armed forces. That is essential for the safety, however, the world is safer place today, than it was a hundred years ago.
It is inevitable that the world has fewer wars compared to the old time in most regions. However, the shortage of natural resources as well as religious issues are undergoing which could potentially foster wars. I person
The world has evolved in the last centuries and now it has become much safer than in earlier times. Government should stop spending hefty amounts of money on their armed forces. I agree with the given statement and we wi
It is now some time since the whole world was involved in one war. The world nowadays is no comparison to the past, when millions of soldiers were lost on the battlefield. Now the world is significantly safer than previo
In recent years, the world has transformed to the safer place compared to hundred years ago. Personally, I disagree with the statement that governments should
It is an undeniable fact that, these days, everyone can go anywhere without worry of anything. If we go back about hundreds of years ago, then it was not safe as compared to now especially for the woman’s and children as
In recent times, the globe is quite peaceful as compared to ancient times. A chunk of people believes that a lot of spending on armed forces by the government should be stopped. I firmly agree with the given statement. T
Owing to fascinating development in the field of arm and other weapons, the 21st century safer compared to past time. May be ten decades ago, in the war, tonnes of people died because of the nuclear weapons. However, som