As a consequent of it the local business comes to an end. With the death of local communities. It can either be agreed or disagreed that the expansion of supermarket affects the local communities. This essay will discuss on the pros and con of the supermarket in some countries with its consequents.
Impossible competition is a opinions about local business from some people which is due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarket in some countries. This can lead to the death of local communities, while I strongly disagree with this view for many reasons.
The development and rapid increasing expansion in gigantic supermarket field contribute widly in the closure of local business due to uncompete with a giant segmant business.
Since the advent of 20th century, we have seen a number of prominent supermarket brands dominating the retail market. With the expansion of such brands to tier-1 and tier-2 cities many people believe that, it can lead to the closure of many local business' and, ultimately lead to the end of local communities. I agree with this argument, and in this essay I will put forth my views with supporting examples.
The way people buy their groceries have changed dramatically. Due to the fast pace growth of multinational grocery stores, many small time merchants have gone out of business. Some believe that this has a detrimental effect on the local community. I completely disagree with this argument, as I believe stronger presence of large organisations will aid to boost the local economy and will provide great benefits.
Substantive issues which folding now about the businesses created by the supermarket and contemporary stores which are generating livelihood by the compact communities taking and giving. It is true competition can't happen among large with tiny shops. Consequent will be discussed between both points of view.
In a recent survey held, it was found that people prefer going to the supermarket rather than small local stores due to the availability of different variety of items. This rapid expansion of stores would make it difficult for local stores to compete with these large supermarkets and hence, I strongly agree that it could lead to the closure of local business which would bring about a death of local communities. Therefore, in this essay I would like to point out a few reasons for the same.
Some people argued that closure of local business will lead to extinction of local communities due to significant development and massive expansion of supermarket in majority of countries. I strongly agree with the former. This essay would discuss my notion.
In this contemporary era, the business economy of every nation growing rapidly due to the wide range and quality of products which always placed in the supermarkets and malls under the one roof. The variety and material quality attracts the all generation consumers at large extent. I strongly agree with the statement given above and I will explain the reasons in the following paragraphs.
The ubiquity and widespread supermarket in modern society is taking a toll on the existence of small scale local businesses. Hence, according to some people, if such trend continues, the likelihood of complete cessation of local shops operation is highly likely and will result in the demise of the local communities. I completely agree with the given view and the points to bolster my opinion will be elaborated in the subsequent paragraph.
The evolution of business competition in supermarket area in some places is pressing smaller business out of the market, therefore a section of the population believes that it will be responsible for the disappearence of local communities. I totally disagree with that statement because bigger and more complex companies can offer better standards of service and also can reduce product prices for the final customer.
The thriving of small scale local firms is hugely impacted by the introduction of world-renowned supermarket chains in rural areas. It is believed that they engulf the locally owned shops. In my opinion, I firmly agree with this argument because these retail chains hardly have sufficient fund and technology to strike back to their opponents.