It argues that operating a community library is mispend finance since changing its ability to access information on the Internet. While I agree that many functions of online libraries can be over community libraries, I b
There is an opinion asserting that dedicating a certain amount of money in order to maintain public libraries is useless since the technology of computers has been improved. I, however, disagree with the given statement
Some people argue that the functions of public libraries are not an essential aspect in the modern era due to the advance of technology in which computers can change the functions of libraries. Although some consider
It is argued that most individuals prefer advanced technology for studying these days. So, spending funds on the preservation of libraries is useless. I agree with the above statement because most people are busy and hav
Some individuals believe that there is no need to spend money for public libraries since computer technology can do the same work better. From my point of view public libraries can offer better opportunities for users.
Nowadays, technology is present in all of our lives, playing an important part in them. However, we shouldn't depend on it, as it is extremely unhealthy for our minds and bodies . I think the abolishment of public instit
In the era of the technological rapid advancement, there is a school of thought holding that pulic libraries are becoming financial burden for government as the information can easily be assessed online. I totally disag
It is a common trend lately to believe that ebooks are slowly replacing public libraries completely. Many who believe that technologies can take the place of physical books hold a view that maintaining a public reading p
Maintaining libraries for public visitors costs a great amount of money. Although there are a few reasons why people want to read on a digital device instead of going to libraries, there are more reasonable grounds that
nowadays some people think that the maintenance of public libraries is a waste of money because of computing technology that has similar functions,while I partly agree with the maintenance of public libraries is a waste
Informational technologies destroyed or going to destroy a lot of traditional forms of knowledge sharing and keeping - classic university classes, newspapers, printed books, encyclopedias and etc. That is why there is ve
Developing technologies change relation to handwriting, reading books, getting information. In the present age, whether maintaining public libraries provides more benefits than seems just a waste of money has sparked muc
The maps illustrate a coastal area in 1950 and its current situation in Australia. Overall, this place has witnessed noticeable developments with regard to facilities, although some parts remain without any changes.
It is considered as the library which is used by general people and the finance is used for its renewal services are unwanted. with the development of technology, these libraries can be taken over.
In recent days, there are those who think that municipal governments do not have a necessary to hold their local libraries because of a widespread network. Though people can read a lot of books online, I disagree with
it is often argued at spending money on libraries is just a waste of funds when computers are available to perform similar functions. Even so, I partially support the given statement and will discuss my supporting points
Whether maintaining public libraries is a waste of money is a topic of discussion. The given topic inform that computer technology can replace the functions of libraries. In the following paragraphs, the reason why I dis
There are those who argue that there is no need to spend money on the maintenance of public libraries since the computer can do the same work better. In my opinion, public libraries are still worth that, for what can off