It is believed that the information about the personal lives of politicians should not be shared in newspapers. I completely agree with this statement because it affects their mental health and image adversely.
It is being argued that media houses should not disclose the personal lives of statesmen. I completely agree with this statement because it will not only violate their right to privacy, but also they should focus their r
Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+
Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words. Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!
It is true that newspapers should not report information of politicians’ personal lives. In this essay, I will explain why I agree with this view to some extent.
It is widely believed that politicians private lives should not be published in newspaper or internet. Personally i completely agree with this viewpoint for variety of reasons.
The details of the personal lives of politicians should not be written publicly in newspapers because information on papers can affect the safety of the politician or his family, and because any human deserves to have a
Many arguments show that politicians’ personal information should be confidential instead of releasing it on social media. This essay strongly agrees with this suggestion because publishing these details could be harmful
People think that the secret life details of political leaders should not be released in news. I totally disagree, as they are role models for society, however, some personal space is everybody's right.
Some set of people believes that the lifestyle of government officials should be publicized while another group of people suggests that they should have their privacy. I believe that the life of statesmen should be in pr
It is thought that the information regarding politicians’ personal lives should not be shared in print media. This essay strongly agrees with this suggestion because publishing these details could be harmful to their fam
It is thought that information regarding politicians’ personal lives should not be shared in print media. This essay strongly agrees with this suggestion because publishing these details could be harmful to their famili
In the present days, the advance of urbanization and technology results in fast-paced world, a plethora of community believe that is not right to do viral of the politicians personel life in media platform. My standpoint
Currently, there is much discussion with private of politicians, It is argued that the newspaper should not be announced the personality of detailed politicians' private life. I completely agree with this topic because s
Nowadays, newspapers are possibly the most popular source of information around the world. It is known that politicians have to appear in public to show their work. However, some papers may want to keep unpublished their
Undoubtedly, a life of a governor has become a very interesting topic for all citizens of a nation since ancient time; notwithstanding, the majority of exponents postulate that media should not publish the personal life
Newspapers should not publish personal details of politicians. I completely agree with this statement as this might cause dangerous threats not only to them but also to their entire family members. Also, knowing about th
It is often argued there is no requirement of publicizing news related to the personal lives of a public servant. I strongly agree with this statement because media should be focused on their social activities instead o
Nowadays, most of the big shots are on public radar. From country’s richest person to politicians to school’s principal, the general people are interested in their lives more than before. The society has become many fold
It is argued by some that newspapers should not be allowed to publish any information about politicians’s private lives. This essay completely agrees with that statement, mainly due to the fundamental right for privacy a
Media most not focus on reporting statements personal lives. I strongly disagree with this statement because people have the rights to know and they would like a decent person to represent their rights.