Environmental protection is one of the most important challenges that we are facing. Some people state that the most effective way to tackle environmental issues is to rise the fuel cost. To some extent, I believe this solution could bring good results but definitely there are much better methods.
It is believed that vehicle emission is one of the main contributors to air pollutants. Therefore, some argue that raising fuel prices is the best method to tackle the environmental issue. I disagree with this point of view because there are better alternatives that can address the root causes of pollution.
In the contemporary society, it is generally believed that the best solution to the environmental problems is to make the fuel expensive. Personally, I totally disagree with this statement.
It is often argued that nowadays, the most effective solution to deal with the environmental issues in the world is increasing the cost of the fuel. From my point of view, I partly agree with this statement.
The frequent use of fuel in automobiles, factories and aircrafts have caused so much damage in our environment today. It is a debated issue whether the increase in the price of petrol and diesel will curb this environmental pollution we are faced with. This may help to some extent but I disagree that increasing fuel price is not the best option to reduce environmental pollution.
It is argued that the major solution to address environmental problems is raising the costs of fossil fuel. This essay is going to explain why this is a common belief and give my opinion on it.
it is a debatable topic that rise the cost of fossil fuel may protect the enviornment from the pollution.This essay will discuss how people can control the glabal warming to protect our ecosystem
A human can not live without the environment but now an increasing number of problems about the environment that affected people. Some people perceive that raise the cost of fuel is the most effective method to tackle the problem. In my opinion, I disagree with this statement because I believe that environmental education and reduce fuel consumption are the best way to fix the root cause of the environmental problem.
Some individuals believe that raising the cost of fuel is the most effective method to solving world's environmental problems. While I accept that this policy is good to some extent, I believe it is not the best because there are much better measure to reduce environmental issues.
Excessive traffic and increasing pollution are affecting every major city in the globe. To lessen such problems, some people say that governments should raise the price of fuel such as diesel and petrol. It may help to some extent, but I disagree that it is the best possible solution to solve the problem of environment.
Environment plays vital role in maintaining the ecosystem of our earth.Our planet today is experiencing severe sort of problems regarding our environment.It is firmly believed by some people that issues regarding our surrounding can be resolved by mounting the value of fuel.I partly agree with the statement and i will elaborate my view by presenting reasonable examples. Firstly,our climate is varied and there are many reasons for it including industries,vehicles and other household equipments.No doubt that there is rise in the air pollution with advances in technology and mechanics.Traffic has been playing a role in the devastation of our climate,smoke emitted from them contains harmful chemicals which are injurious to health.Furthermore,industries also have a hand in it as they also release harmful gases and also pollute our water canals.This could be controlled by the influence on the fuel as fuel is the fundamental and best priority of every gadget so it can be kept in check. However,by making fuel rare we will face many hardships as we are dependent on the industries and vehicles and we cannot even carry out our minor works.Beside this the environment face consequences by the usual things like refrigerators and air conditioners.They contain chemicals which cause effects like global warming and these are not dependent on the fuel. To conclude,we can control these problems by the increase in the price of fuel but we will have to face many other consequences.
Environmentalists Hold varying opinions on how to approach the ever deteriorating ecosystem problem. Some consider raising the rate of gas is the most efficient way to remedy this environmental catastrophe. I, however, disagree that raising fuel cost on a global scale would help in alleviating the problem and this essay addresses The reasons behind my position.
These days, the world’s environmental condition has become dire due to the lack of effective measures taken to diminish the problem. One major way to combat environmental hazards is to increase the price of fuel, which is one of the significant sources of catastrophes that could instigate environmental degradation. However, I do not agree that this is the finest solution for reducing environmental problems as some other ways would be much more effective for solving the problems related to the environment.
There is an upward rise in pollution and disruption in the normal environmental habitat in the world. The most effective method to minimize this issue is by inflating fuel price. However, I completely disagree that this is the best way to counter this problem.
In this modern ,era environmental deterioration is exacerbating. Many people believe that the fuel cost hike is the most effective way to tackle this issue. I completely disagree with this notion and the following essay will put forward points in support of my view.
Some people believe that increasing the price of fuel is the best way to address the world’s environmental issue. From my point of view, I somewhat agree with this statement.
It is irrefutable that, rise in environmental pollution become a hot topic to discuss. Some ethnic group are with the verdict that the government should raise the charge of smoke like petrol and diesel. This issue is quite controversial, but I am partially agreeing with this statement. In my essay, I intend the delve into the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches.
The line graph illustrates the amount of three kinds of spreads (oil, low fat and reduced the spreads and butter butter) which were consumed over 26 years from 1981 to 2007. Units are measured in ancestor.
Fuel is the most essential resource in our modern society. For example, Coal and natural gas fire up power plants and light up billions of homes across the world, petrol and kerosene ignite car engines to connect people in an unimaginable way we could never think of. However, some say that increasing the prices of fuel would help solve global environmental issues, but the disruptions to our lives might be a huge drawback that we can never afford.
Global warming is a massive threat to our planet and the main factor which are contributing the most is fossil fuels. The efficient method to tackle the earth ecological issue is to rise up petroleum product net value. I disagree with this statement because there is no alternative energy source and it will soar up the costliness rate.