Whilst it is considered that the crucial purpose of science ought to be to enhance individuals’ lives, I completely disagree with this statement for some reasons.
These days it seems that most scientists ought to focus on people’s lives and use their knowledge to help people. However, some experiments that scientists do are against humanity or sometimes even make life harder for
Many mentioned that the primary goal of science is to enhance the lives of people and I strongly agree with the idea. I will discuss my insight through my essay.
It is undeniable that science is a powerful tool that can alter our reality in ways that were once unimaginable. While Some people, including myself, believe that the ultimate goal of science should be to improve people’
It is clear that the goal of science must grow suitable and calm for the community's life. Furthermore, this boost should reduce the cost of folk's life and so on. In addition, it is undeniable that this issue is one of
These days it seems that more scientists should focus on the subjects that save human life. Scientific developments are occurring at a great rate but some of them do not seem to be of help to humans. In fact, sometimes
In this modern era, with the development of science individual’s life has become easily accessible. I agree with the statement that science plays a vital role in enhancing the quality of human life.
Nowadays many knowledges was invented by the scientist and was being used to improve human life for as long as history was recorded. Some people like you that human life should not be the highest priority in science Whil
Some people argue that science should necessary in our lives. because that provides more convenience and comfortable in our lives. I strongly believe that tech development will enhance our lifestyle.
Scientific developments are occurring at a great rate but some of them do not seem to be of help to people. In fact, sometimes scientific innovations are regretted by those who invented them. This essay will argue that s
It is debated whether scientists should strive to enhance and bolster people's well-being or pursue groundbreaking advancements in the realm of science, regardless of potential harm. I firmly agree that scientific discov
The question of whether scientific endeavours should primarily serve to improve people's well-being or advance groundbreaking discoveries, potentially regardless of harm, is a subject of ongoing debate. I firmly advocate
It’s true that the subject of what is the purpose of science has been a controversial issue that people like to debate about. Some scientists argue that the aim should be the improvement of people’s lives, however, other
Nowadays, the most significant thing is science and technology. Moreover, with modern life people aim to use Science more often. However, does Science improve people’s life? Notably, persons tend to use what made their l
Nowadays , science and technology have spread in all fields and life is in the palm of our hands . Therefore , some people say that science should improve human life. I totally agree with this viewpoint and I will give p
Science is an intellectual subject which has enormous usefulness, it improves the area of biology, humanity, and chemistry. It is been argued that the paramount of science is to enhance people's living quality. It seems
Scientific developments are occurring at a great rate but some of them do not seem to be helpful to people. In fact, sometimes scientific innovations are regretted by those who invented them. This essay will argue that s
The improvement of science will enhance people’s standards of living. In my opinion, I agree that the advancement of science helps people in many ways like in food production, entertainment, and healthcare.
Studying science has many goals and it can improve people’s lives. By science, Improving their lives are important, but finding new scientific knowledge is also important I think.
It is believed that the most fundamental role of science is enhancing humans life quality. I agree with this opinion to some extent, however, I have reasons for disagreement as well that I will discuss in the subsequent