Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Protecting wild animals in the 21st century is an arguable debate subject, with advocat
Wild creatures are facing great danger nowadays and raise people's more attention than ever before. While some people may consider wildlife protection as meaningless, I would argue that protecting wild species will bring
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money to preserve wild animals because they have no need for humans. This essay with discuss some key reasons why I disagree with the point of view.
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view. In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wi
Driven by industrialization and other human activities, the living space of wild animals has decreased to a large degree. As a result, some people argue that saving their lives can waste resources that are precious to us
It is argued that the habitats of wild animals are endangered. While some people accept that protecting creatures in the woods is a kind of a waste of money. I personally believe that saving the environment can help us t
It is often argued that protecting non-domestic animals is a disadvantage for our society because of all the necessities that they demand. However, I disagree with that statement about the importance of all the races in
Some people believed that wild animals must not exist in this century. Moreover, they argue that keeping them is not beneficial. I am completely disagree with this opinion.
Nowadays some people argued that protecting wild animals from their extinction is useless, rubbish for money and time. From my point of view, I completely disagree this statement. A strong contradiction to this view will
Some individuals argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.
Some people argue that spending money on wildlife protection is pointless because we humans do not need them. I cannot entirely agree with this point of view.
Recently, the topic that encourages humans to stop protecting animals because they have no value to us has sparked great controversy. Although people who agree have their own justification, I hold a completely different
We live in a world today where some people argue that saving wild animals from extinction is a waste of cash. This essay totally disagrees with that statement, I believe that protecting animals is one of the duties of ma
In our modern life, the place is not available for wild animals.That is why,the majority of humans think that protecting them is not necessary.From my point of view,this type of decision is not true.This essay agrees tha
Wild species have been losing their habitats in recent years. Even though some argue that saving animals is useless, humans still try to protect wildlife from danger. It is not saying that protecting wildlife from danger
Different countries' consumer spendings are quite different. The table shows the vary consumer spending on a series of items in the five countries, namely, the Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in 2002.
Nowadays, most people believe that there are no more spaces for wildlife to stay and to keep living for their life, and spending money on them is not a good idea. I totally disagree with this point of view, and this essa
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view. In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that
Wildlife has changed in recent decades as a result of dramatic changes in human society. A lot of species have become endangered or even extinct which compelled humanity to provide measures for the conservation and prote
In the fast-paced world, there is no place for wild animals to live, so trying to prevent them from extinction is supposed to be a waste the natural sources. I partly agree with this statement, however, I believe that