The debate over whether to repair old public structures or replace them with new ones involves both practical and cultural considerations. Some argue for a replacement to save expenses and modernize infrastructure, while others believe in preserving these edifices due to their historical and cultural significance. Supporters of replacing old facilities often point to the high outlay of repairs and maintenance. Older architecture frequently requires substantial investment to meet current safety and efficiency standards. For example, they may have outdated systems that lead to higher operational outflows. Building new designs can be more cost-effective in the long term, incorporating energy efficiency and modern technology to meet contemporary needs better. Conversely, opponents emphasize the historical and cultural value of the old establishment. Houses like town halls and art galleries are architectural landmarks that reflect a city's heritage and identity. Preserving this architect...